Not Such a Literary Byway: The Ten Thousand Doors of January, by Alix E. Harrow

About Forums Den of Writers Blogs Not Such a Literary Byway: The Ten Thousand Doors of January, by Alix E. Harrow

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #12402
    RichardB
    Participant

    I can’t in all conscience call this a literary byway, since the subject of this blog isn’t some dusty, half-forgotten relic but a book that’s very much alive and kicking, having been published only three years ago and even been nominated for awards. But I’ve enjoyed it so much that I’d like to share that enjoyment with you, so here goes.

    Looking back over my previous Literary Byway blogs, I notice that every book I’ve written about has had some element of the fantastical or speculative about it. The Ten Thousand Doors of January is also a fantasy, sort of. You might assume from this that I’m an avid reader of the genre, but you’d be wrong.

    Yes, I loved The Lord of the Rings when I first read it at the age of eighteen, and I still do. It led me to its predecessors in the genre, mostly in the now-classic Ballantine Adult Fantasy series, but apart from Terry Pratchett, who was a delightful law unto himself, I’ve read very little fantasy for many years, and what I have sampled hasn’t, by and large, impressed me much. Ursula K. Le Guin’s rather bad-tempered verdict on post-LOTR fantasy, written some years back in the introduction to Tales of Earthsea, sums up the reasons.

    Commodified fantasy takes no risks: it invents nothing, but imitates and trivialises. It proceeds by depriving the old stories of their intellectual and ethical complexity, turning their action to violence, their actors to dolls, and their truth-telling to sentimental platitude… The passionately conceived ideas of the great story-tellers are copied, stereotyped, reduced to toys, moulded in bright-coloured plastic, advertised, sold, broken, junked, replaceable, interchangeable.

    A bit harsh maybe, but yes. Whereas Tolkien’s well-springs were ancient Celtic and Nordic mythologies, most of the stuff that’s come since seems to have been inspired by him, at second- or even third-hand. Hand-me-down inspiration. Replaceable, interchangeable.

    Alix E. Harrow’s debut novel is not like that. There’s not a warrior or a wizard, an elf or a dragon in sight. The Ten Thousand Doors of January is not like any other fantasy I’ve ever read.

    The time is the first years of the twentieth century; the place Vermont, USA. January Scaller lives in a mansion with her guardian, the rich and powerful Cornelius Locke, and his huge collection of exotic artifacts. She has never known her mother and seldom sees her father, who is employed by Locke and spends most of his time travelling the world searching for more items for the collection. A spirited, unruly girl, she chafes against the restrictions imposed upon her by her guardian’s expectations of conformity and good behaviour, and escapes the narrowness of her horizons and her loneliness by losing herself in pulp fiction and dreaming of adventure.

    A not unfamiliar scenario, but then, when she is seventeen, she finds a mysterious book in equally mysterious circumstances. Voracious reader that she is, naturally she can’t resist looking inside. What she reads there will fundamentally change her life, in ways she could never have imagined…

    That’s about as far as I can go, because the story is so full of twists and revelations that I’d be giving out spoilers otherwise. I can say, without giving away too much, that its basic premise is that there are doorways to other worlds, not just in the back of a wardrobe but in all sorts of hidden places. It’s been done before, but not quite like this. It is, we are told, the leakage from other worlds through these doorways that gives us our legends and folklore and magic and most of what’s rich and strange in this world. They were what brought January’s parents together, and that is why she is named, not for the month, but for the god the month was named after – for Janus was the god of, among other things, doorways.

    I can also tell you is that this book is quite a bit more than a fantasy adventure story. It is a celebration of the power of words and stories and legends, a manifesto for the untamed and the wondrous and the marvellous, a protest against materialism and the stultification of the imagination. It is a bildungsroman, a coming-of-age story, since January spends most of the book finding out who she is. Above all, it is a heart-wrenching – and ultimately heart-warming – tale of love and loss and redemption. It is the sort of book that leaves you smiling.

    But what really makes it stand out for me is the engaging exuberance and adventurousness and wit of its prose. January’s voice is one of the strongest and most distinctive I have encountered in fiction. She has the power of words, more literally than you can imagine (Hah! Is that a spoiler? Nah, more of a teaser.), and she uses them to great effect in telling her story. It got to the point where I became quite disappointed if I went for more than two or three pages without encountering an image or or a phrase so precisely apt and so vividly evocative that it brought forth a little mental gasp of delight and admiration. Like this:

    Then she laughed – a wild, whooping laugh that rolled over the water to Yule like summertime thunder.

    He smiled – a predatory, life-hungry smile, and God help you if you’ve ever seen a smile like that on a human face – and I ran.

    Her voice was strangled, almost swallowed by emotion: bitterest betrayal, jealousy, and the sort of rage that leaves bodies in its wake.

    I once said that there are books I can read and re-read for the sheer pleasure I get from the quality of the writing. The Ten Thousand Doors of January looks set to become one of them.

    #12403
    Kate
    Participant

    I think our reading tastes have developed in a similar way, Richard. I read fantasy as a teen (though never a LOTR fan) but as I got older and every book back I read seemed to involve a magic sword or a ring and sorting the good from the bad became impossible, I moved away from the genre.

    I do enjoy (and often write) our reality with a fantastical thread. I have gravitated towards books like the excellent magical realism novel, The Watchmaker of Filigree Street by Natasha Pulley.

    Recent pure fantasy offerings often disappoint, though I am enjoying Victoria Schwab’s A Darker Shade of Magic, which also involves doors between worlds.

    You’ve very much sold me on the The Ten Thousand Doors of January. I shall order it now and look forward to reading.

    #12404
    Athelstone
    Moderator

    Well, you’ve convinced me. I may have to add  have added the book to my ever-growing kindle list. Another great blog by the way.

    “A bit harsh maybe” you say, of Ursula K. Le Guin’s remarks. My feelings about this are mixed. I can see her point, but I am not convinced. I would have thought that the way we approach the old stories is what matters. If we approach openly, hoping to learn, looking for the truth-telling, then that’s great. But how many have ever done that? I suspect that the old stories have always ranged from ripping good yarns to revered sacred texts to the bulk of the populace. The trivialisation of legends, or at least of their “tropes”, may be disrespectful, but I suspect it doesn’t discourage anybody who might be inclined to look closer.

    On the other hand, I agree with your point, which is slightly different, that much fantasy, at least of the sword and sorcery variety, is hand-me-down inspiration: the swords dulled, the sorcery damp squibs.

     

     

     

    #12405
    RichardB
    Participant

    ‘…Every book back I read seemed to involve a magic sword or a ring and sorting the good from the bad became impossible…’ Yes, Kate, that was exactly my experience.

    By contrast, to take a selection of the Ballantine books I read in my youth, The Well at the World’s End (William Morris), The Worm Ouroboros (E R Edison), The Night Land (William Hope Hodgson) and The King of Elfland’s Daughter (Lord Dunsanay) are all about as different from each other as could be imagined.

    I can assure you that there are no swords or rings at all, let alone magic ones, in The Ten Thousand Doors of January.

    #12417
    Daedalus
    Participant

    That sounds fantastic (in both senses of the word). My tbr pile is probably already longer than I will get through in my lifetime but I will add it anyway.

    Fantasy definitely did seem to go through an obligatory magic ring/sword phase, not to mention the ominpresent dark lord – the overlong series’ of Terry Brooks, Terry Goodkind and, to a lesser extent, Robert Jordan all strike me as notably Tolkein-dependant from what I’ve heard/read – but I think we’re mostly well out of it now. My other half is a huge fantasy fan (and immensely picky about what she reads) and we talk about it quite a bit. Dr Daedalus laid aside Sword of Shannara in disappointment at how derivative it was, but on the other hand there are high fantasy series by Robin Hobb, Steven Erikson, George RR Martin to pick a few that divert strikingly from the Tolkeinesque world, or utterly subvert the tropes and expectations of a conventional high fantasy series. There’s also a thriving and innovative world of urban fantasy of which it sounds Ten Thousand Doors is a good example.

    So I think Le Guin is being a little harsh here, in the same way that Margaret Attwood was about science fiction, criticising her idea of it rather than what the thing itself had become. Although I do note her qualification ‘commodified’ which covers a multitude of sins. There is still no doubt a lot of hackneyed stuff out there. I remember a review of the film of Christopher Paolini’s ‘Eragon’ that simply read “It’s ‘dragon’ with an ‘e’, that’s as interesting as it gets”.

    #12432
    RichardB
    Participant

    I’m not sure that I’d call The Ten Thousand Doors urban fantasy, exactly, as I understand it (yes, I did go and look it up). it has some of the tropes, like fantastical elements intruding into our world, but the setting is neither urban nor contemporary.

    I take your point about some modern fantasy being more original (I’ve sampled George R R Martin, but eventually got lost in the diffuse meanderings of the plotting), and I’ve no doubt missed out on some good stuff, but hey, life’s too short.

    #12433
    Sandra
    Participant

    Thank you for this Richard, on the strength of which I’ve just recommended it to my daughter.

    #12434
    Daedalus
    Participant

    You’re probably right re urban fantasy, I have a rather vague grasp on the various subgenres, and that’s when authors oblige and ensure that their work falls squarely within one category. I have no idea where to put China Mieville’s Bas-Lag novels, and I suspect he likes it that way. They have the epic sweep and complex magical systems of high fantasy but a post-industrial urban setting, distinct steampunk overtones and not a few aspects more akin to horror.

    George RR Martin rewards only utter commitment and multiple rereadings. There are so many details that just aren’t noticeable but can actually have a big impact on your understanding of the story. Part of that is the result of Martin’s deconstructive attitude to the common tropes. For example (and this is true of the novels so far published, not the TV series), imagine there being a ‘hidden prince,’ the true heir to the throne, only everyone who knows of their existence is dead, there’s no way for the prince to learn of their true identity and so that’s effectively that. And moreover it’s never explicitly set out, you have to pick it up from a couple of asides here and there. You have to unlearn a lot to get the most from them. And you also have to be prepared for any character you might vaguely care about to die, probably horribly and almost certainly pointlessly.

    #12436
    RichardB
    Participant

    I discussed that last point with the person who recommended the series to me, and we agreed that that’s actually one of its strengths. In real-life situations of war, revolution, unrest etc good people are just as likely, or even more likely, to get killed as bad people. The atrocities that occur at regular intervals are paralleled in real life too, though Martin does tend to rub your nose in it a bit. That was another thing that put me off. I don’t want my fiction to be insipid sweetness and light, but so much (almost) unrelieved nastiness was getting a bit depressing.

    #12437
    Daedalus
    Participant

    Very true. There are precious few lighter moments. Mind you, he’s not quite the worst author I know for that. Not exactly fantasy (although he did write a collaborative series with Terry Pratchett), Stephen Baxter has the habit of making you identify with and root for particular characters, and then watch as their responses to ever tougher circumstances make them less and less sympathetic until you realise you’re effectively making mental excuses for the villain. It makes you realise how people can end up following leaders who start out offering simple answers and a bright future and end up less Mandela than Mugabe.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.